Anti-Death Penalty Essay -- Capital Punishment Death Penalty essays pa

Let us suppose that killing, as a form of punishment, is morally and universally accepted. Would it then be acceptable to get laid this to some, while letting others avoid it? It is acceptable to our criminal justice system for it seems to be standard operating procedure. Many believe the devastation penalty establish on the Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth concept. The wipeout penalty is improper due to the price and time of executing person, that it isnt a deterrent against violent crime, and how unrighteous and contradicting it is.There are popular line of merchandises in todays public to support the death penalty. Some say that if we kill a man sentenced to the death penalty, it costs less than to keep that inmate locked up for the rest of his life. Also, the public feels that if we show violent offenders that they will be killed if they kill another, it will make them entail twice about killing. Finally, people feel if someone is convicted of murder, they should be sente nced to the death penalty. However, research and facts show these arguments are not well founded. A popular argument says that we spend too much money to incarcerate prisoners. A study done in Florida shows the price tag on issuing a death penalty is 3.1 million dollars as where the typical life sentence costs 1 million dollars (Walker 108). That is a 3100% difference in the price of executing someone compared to putting them in jail for life. Also, executions take up to fifteen years or longer to be carri...